# TellTale Report: pathological-session-specimen > This run is partial and should be treated as partial evidence. ## 1. What was analyzed - **Session:** pathological-session-specimen - **Run ID:** public-demo - **Events:** 1084 - **Primary incidents:** 138 - **Primary finding hits:** 118 - **Secondary warning hits:** 145 - **Total flagged events:** 242 ## 2. Source provenance - **Input artifact:** sanitized-public-session-bundle - **Source artifact:** reset-polluted-session-specimen.jsonl - **Source kinds:** session - **Time window:** 4/19/2026, 4:03:31 AM → 4/20/2026, 10:25:20 AM ## 3. Coverage / confidence - **Completeness:** ⚠️ PARTIAL - **Report confidence:** MEDIUM - **Evidence window:** 4/19/2026, 4:03:31 AM → 4/20/2026, 3:00:34 AM - **Source window:** 4/19/2026, 4:03:31 AM → 4/20/2026, 10:25:20 AM - **Snapshots:** 0 - **Records represented:** 724 ## 4. Chronological incident summary - **4/20/2026, 3:00:34 AM** — **coverage break**: continuity confidence drops because the evidence span no longer fully covers the source artifact. - **4/19/2026, 4:03:31 AM** — **replay/collision onset**: repeated or stale content begins accumulating after the trust boundary weakens. ## 5. Main findings ### Finding A — continuity confidence drops across a visible coverage break The source stops behaving like a continuous trustworthy record after a visible boundary. ### Finding B — replay/collision patterns accumulate after the break Repeated high-specificity content and item reuse appear in ways more consistent with replay, collision, or stale-branch reuse than with normal continuation. ### Finding C — downstream state becomes mixed rather than cleanly continued The post-break region contains enough contradictory structure to justify bounded distrust of downstream conclusions. ## 6. Evidence excerpts / trace anchors ### Structural anchors - Anchor 1: a visible coverage break marks the point where continuity confidence drops. - Anchor 2: replay/collision behavior appears after the break and repeats across the degraded span. - Anchor 3: downstream state remains mixed enough that the affected region should be treated as bounded partial evidence. *(Concrete client-facing anchors should point to stable excerpts or timestamps without exposing private runtime traces.)* ## 7. Uncertainties - The source is partial, so we cannot claim complete historical visibility. - The report speaks to structural trustworthiness, not user intent or root-cause certainty. - The public demo surface intentionally withholds raw runtime traces. ## 8. Recommended interpretation / next steps ### Recommended interpretation Treat this run as **not fully trustworthy as a continuous history**. The evidence is strong enough to justify re-checking or discarding downstream conclusions that depend on the broken region. ### Suggested next steps 1. preserve the original raw artifact bundle 2. isolate the reset boundary or suspected migration point 3. compare against a quieter control/baseline run if available 4. avoid building critical conclusions on the polluted span without further review ## Closing line TellTale’s value here is not that it proves everything. It makes the trustworthy vs untrustworthy parts of the visible trajectory easier to separate and reason about.